<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="gyre/0.0.1" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>eighty-twenty news</title>
    <link>http://www.eighty-twenty.org/index.cgi</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>

        <item>
      <title>StoJ gets a home of its own</title>
      <link>http://www.eighty-twenty.org/index.cgi/_STORY_/tech/systems-biology/stoj-20050414.html</link>
      <description>We've just set up a &lt;a href="http://www.lshift.net/stoj.html"&gt;page for
StoJ at &lt;tt&gt;lshift.net&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, subsuming the &lt;a
href="http://www.eighty-twenty.org/index.cgi/_STORY_/tech/systems-biology/join-20040904.html"&gt;previous&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a
href="http://www.eighty-twenty.org/index.cgi/_STORY_/tech/systems-biology/stoj-20040914.html"&gt;two&lt;/a&gt;
stories about StoJ and providing a link to a running implementation
that can be tried out over the web.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>StoJ, an implementation of Stochastic Join</title>
      <link>http://www.eighty-twenty.org/index.cgi/_STORY_/tech/systems-biology/stoj-20040914.html</link>
      <description>Well, since I &lt;a
href="http://www.eighty-twenty.org/index.cgi/_STORY_/tech/systems-biology/join-20040904.html"&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt;
about some of the issues in stochastic-π based biological modelling,
I've had a little spare time, a little inspiration, and a supportive
workplace environment (thanks again, &lt;a
href="http://www.lshift.net"&gt;LShift&lt;/a&gt;!), and I've implemented StoJ,
a polyadic, asynchronous stochastic π calculus with input join and no
summation. Rates are associated with a join, not with a cha...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stochastic Join?</title>
      <link>http://www.eighty-twenty.org/index.cgi/_STORY_/tech/systems-biology/join-20040904.html</link>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;mikeb&lt;/tt&gt; and I were discussing the papers given at BioConcur the
other day, and we were puzzling out the differences between the
standard way of modelling biochemical and biological reactions
(including genetic interference reactions) and our "alternative"
modelling style. I suppose the "alternative" style must have been
tried before, and that it must display some obvious weakness we
haven't spotted yet.

&lt;p&gt; Here's a comparison of the two styles:
&lt;table class="columnar"&gt;
  &lt;tr&gt;
    &lt;th&gt;Bi...</description>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>
